Search the Community
Showing results for tags 'penalties'.
Found 1 result
A lot of you think that I am totally against being held accountable for alliance issues-which is so not true. What I am against is being policed and not trusted after 100% demonstrating my preparedness and viability for our alliance. There are others as well who have shown their dedication whom I would never question their assets and loyalties. There are a couple, however, whom I do have concern about-concerns about individuals and corporations-that, in my opinion, do need to be kept a close watch over. For that reason I would like to discuss how we could accomplish conformity uniformity within the alliance to make things stronger. One thought that came to mind is if the CoTP council feels as though there is a problem with a player or corporation, it would reserve the right to probate, if you will, via api(s), penalties and such. By no means would this diminish Shadows authority as head of security but rather strengthens it via the backing of alliance. It would give him reason. However, it does allow for and respect the privacy of corporations and players by limiting the outright capabilities of search. Think of it as a search warrant.